4.6 Review

Vascular Dysfunctions Contribute to the Long-Term Cognitive Deficits Following COVID-19

期刊

BIOLOGY-BASEL
卷 12, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biology12081106

关键词

long COVID; SARS-CoV-2; endothelial cells; cognitive dysfunction; blood-brain barrier; neuro-inflammation

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) primarily affects the respiratory system but can also cause neurological symptoms and cognitive difficulties. These complications can last for months after infection, disrupting daily life. This review summarizes the current understanding of the effects of COVID-19 on vascular dysfunction and how it leads to cognitive impairment.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a single-stranded RNA virus and a member of the corona virus family, primarily affecting the upper respiratory system and the lungs. Like many other respiratory viruses, SARS-CoV-2 can spread to other organ systems. Apart from causing diarrhea, another very common but debilitating complication caused by SARS-CoV-2 is neurological symptoms and cognitive difficulties, which occur in up to two thirds of hospitalized COVID-19 patients and range from shortness of concentration and overall declined cognitive speed to executive or memory function impairment. Neuro-cognitive dysfunction and brain fog are frequently present in COVID-19 cases, which can last several months after the infection, leading to disruption of daily life. Cumulative evidence suggests that SARS-CoV-2 affects vasculature in the extra-pulmonary systems directly or indirectly, leading to impairment of endothelial function and even multi-organ damage. The post COVID-19 long-lasting neurocognitive impairments have not been studied fully and their underlying mechanism remains elusive. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of the effects of COVID-19 on vascular dysfunction and how vascular dysfunction leads to cognitive impairment in patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据