4.6 Review

Global eligibility and cost effectiveness of icosapent ethyl in primary and secondary cardiovascular prevention

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1220017

关键词

eicosapentaenoic acid; cardiovascular disease; cost effectiveness; icosapent ethyl; eligibility

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review summarizes the eligibility and cost effectiveness studies of IPE conducted to date. Sixteen studies with 2,068,111 patients in primary or secondary prevention settings worldwide were included. The proportion of patients eligible for IPE ranged from 15% to 45%, depending on the selection criteria and population studied. Overall, eight cost-effectiveness studies from the US, Canada, Germany, Israel, and Australia indicated that IPE is particularly cost effective in patients with established CVD.
Icosapent ethyl (IPE) is a purified eicosapentaenoic acid-only omega-3 fatty acid that significantly reduced cardiovascular (CV) events in patients receiving statins with established cardiovascular disease (CVD) and those with diabetes and additional risk factors in the pivotal REDUCE-IT trial. Since the publication of REDUCE-IT, there has been global interest in determining IPE eligibility in different patient populations, the proportion of patients who may benefit from IPE, and cost effectiveness of IPE in primary and secondary prevention settings. The aim of this review is to summarize information from eligibility and cost effectiveness studies of IPE to date. A total of sixteen studies were reviewed, involving 2,068,111 patients in the primary or secondary prevention settings worldwide. Up to forty-five percent of patients were eligible for IPE, depending on the selection criteria used (ie, REDUCE-IT criteria, US Food and Drug Administration label, Health Canada label, practice guidelines) and the population studied. Overall, eight cost-effectiveness studies across the United States, Canada, Germany, Israel, and Australia were included in this review and findings indicated that IPE is particularly cost effective in patients with established CVD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据