4.6 Article

Case report: Combination of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and intra-aortic balloon pump in a young male patient with refractory cardiogenic shock due to aluminum phosphide poisoning

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1226827

关键词

cardiogenic shock; VA-ECMO; aluminium phosphide; IABP; mechanical circulatory support

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a case of refractory cardiogenic shock due to possible aluminum phosphide poisoning. The patient received treatments including veno-arterial membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), and eventually recovered and was discharged.
BackgroundAcute toxic myocardial damage may be accompanied by the development of cardiogenic shock (CS), the mortality from which is still unacceptably high. Since there is no specific antidote for many types of toxins, treatment of such patients includes various measures of hemodynamic and respiratory support. The paper presents a case of refractory CS due to possible aluminum phosphide (AP) poisoning.Case summaryA 20-year-old man was admitted to the emergency department 4 days after home inhalation of AP due to complaints of nausea, vomiting, abdominal and chest pain. Over the next few hours, he rapidly developed CS, which was refractory to conservative treatment. Therefore, veno-arterial membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) was performed, during which hemodynamics stabilized, but later there were signs of left ventricular overload. To unload the left ventricle (LV), an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) was implanted, which significantly improved the patient's condition. After 6 days the patient was decannulated, and a few more days later IABP was discontinued. Subsequently, the patient was treated for sepsis due to bilateral pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome and optimal medical therapy for heart failure was prescribed. The patient was discharged after 34th day of hospitalization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据