4.7 Article

CRISPR prime editing for unconstrained correction of oncogenic KRAS variants

期刊

COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY
卷 6, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-05052-1

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A universal pegRNA was developed in this study to correct all types of G12 and G13 oncogenic KRAS mutations using CRISPR-mediated prime editors (PEs). The universal pegRNA successfully corrected 12 types of KRAS mutations with up to 54.8% correction frequency in HEK293T/17 cells. Endogenous KRAS mutations in human cancer cells, specifically G13D KRAS mutation, were also successfully corrected to wild-type KRAS sequences with up to 40.6% correction frequency without indel mutations. The findings suggest the potential of utilizing prime editing with the universal pegRNA as a "one-to-many" therapeutic strategy for KRAS oncogene variants.
KRAS is the most commonly mutated RAS family gene and is a primary cause of the occurrence of several types of cancer. However, KRAS mutations have several unique and diverse molecular identities, making it difficult to find specific treatments. Here, we developed universal pegRNAs which can correct all types of G12 and G13 oncogenic KRAS mutations with CRISPR-mediated prime editors (PEs). The universal pegRNA successfully corrected 12 types of KRAS mutations, accounting for 94% of all known KRAS mutations, by up to 54.8% correction frequency in HEK293T/17 cells. We also applied the universal pegRNA to correct endogenous KRAS mutations in human cancer cells and found that G13D KRAS mutation was successfully corrected to wild-type KRAS sequences with up to 40.6% correction frequency without indel mutations. We propose prime editing with the universal pegRNA as a 'one-to-many' potential therapeutic strategy for KRAS oncogene variants. A CRISPR prime editing approach corrects all types of G12 and G13 oncogenic KRAS mutations using a universal pegRNA, demonstrating the potential of applying this system to KRAS gene therapy through a oneto-many approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据