4.6 Article

Calcium Electrochemotherapy for Tumor Eradication and the Potential of High-Frequency Nanosecond Protocols

期刊

PHARMACEUTICALS
卷 16, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ph16081083

关键词

cancer; calcium; nanosecond; electroporation; immunology; immunomodulation; anticancer; in vivo

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Calcium electroporation (CaEP) is a promising treatment for cancer, as it effectively eliminates tumors and enhances the immune response. This study presents both microsecond and nanosecond protocols for CaEP, demonstrating their efficacy in tumor eradication and improved survival rates in mice. CaEP treatment leads to an increased percentage of CD4(+) and CD8(+) central memory T cells, reduced splenic myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and elevated levels of antitumor antibodies.
Calcium electroporation (CaEP) is an innovative approach to treating cancer, involving the internalization of supraphysiological amounts of calcium through electroporation, which leads to cell death. CaEP enables the replacement of chemotherapeutics (e.g., bleomycin). Here, we present a standard microsecond ( mu sCaEP) and novel high-frequency nanosecond protocols for calcium electroporation (nsCaEP) for the elimination of carcinoma tumors in C57BL/6J mice. We show the efficacy of CaEP in eliminating tumors and increasing their survival rates in vivo. The antitumor immune response after the treatment was observed by investigating immune cell populations in tumors, spleens, lymph nodes, and blood, as well as assessing antitumor antibodies. CaEP treatment resulted in an increased percentage of CD4(+) and CD8(+) central memory T cells and decreased splenic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC). Moreover, increased levels of antitumor IgG antibodies after CaEP treatment were detected. The experimental results demonstrated that the administration of CaEP led to tumor growth delay, increased survival rates, and stimulated immune response, indicating a potential synergistic relationship between CaEP and immunotherapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据