4.6 Review

Prospects of Topoisomerase Inhibitors as Promising Anti-Cancer Agents

期刊

PHARMACEUTICALS
卷 16, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ph16101456

关键词

cancer; clinical; marketed drugs; pre-clinical; topoisomerase

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Topoisomerase inhibitors play a critical role as anti-cancer medications by disrupting the normal function of these enzymes, leading to DNA damage and cell death. Topoisomerase I inhibitors prevent DNA resealing, causing inhibition of DNA replication and cell death, while topoisomerase II inhibitors impede the release of double-strand DNA breaks by cleaving DNA complexes.
Topoisomerases are very important enzymes that regulate DNA topology and are vital for biological actions like DNA replication, transcription, and repair. The emergence and spread of cancer has been intimately associated with topoisomerase dysregulation. Topoisomerase inhibitors have consequently become potential anti-cancer medications because of their ability to obstruct the normal function of these enzymes, which leads to DNA damage and subsequently causes cell death. This review emphasizes the importance of topoisomerase inhibitors as marketed, clinical and preclinical anti-cancer medications. In the present review, various types of topoisomerase inhibitors and their mechanisms of action have been discussed. Topoisomerase I inhibitors, which include irinotecan and topotecan, are agents that interact with the DNA-topoisomerase I complex and avert resealing of the DNA. The accretion of DNA breaks leads to the inhibition of DNA replication and cell death. On the other hand, topoisomerase II inhibitors like etoposide and teniposide, function by cleaving the DNA-topoisomerase II complex thereby effectively impeding the release of double-strand DNA breaks. Moreover, the recent advances in exploring the therapeutic efficacy, toxicity, and MDR (multidrug resistance) issues of new topoisomerase inhibitors have been reviewed in the present review.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据