4.7 Article

Interdisciplinary Treatment of Malignant Chest Wall Tumors

期刊

JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE
卷 13, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jpm13091405

关键词

Special Issues; thoracic surgery; plastic surgery; reconstructive surgery; chest wall tumors; chest wall resection; chest wall reconstruction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In patients who underwent surgical resection for primary and secondary MCWTs, chest wall resections were found to be feasible with good perioperative outcomes. The overall survival rate was significantly higher in patients with primary MCWTs compared to those with secondary MCWTs.
Background: Chest wall resections for malignant chest wall tumors (MCWTs), particularly those with full-thickness chest wall involvement requiring reconstruction, present a therapeutic challenge for thoracic and plastic reconstructive surgeons. The purpose of this study was to review our experience with chest wall resection for primary and metastatic MCWTs, with a focus on perioperative outcomes and postoperative overall survival (OS). Methods: All patients who underwent surgical resection for primary and secondary MCWTs at our single institution between 2000 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Results: A total of 42 patients (25 male, median age 60 years) operated upon with curative (n = 37, 88.1%) or palliative (n = 5, 11.9%) intent were reviewed. Some 33 (78%) MCWTs were of secondary origin. Chest wall reconstruction was required in 40 (95%) cases. A total of 13 (31%) patients had postoperative complications and one (2.3%) died perioperatively. The 5-year postoperative overall survival rate was 51.9%. The postoperative 5-year survival rate of 42.6% in patients with secondary MCWTs was significantly lower compared to the figure of 87.5% in patients with primary MCWTs. Conclusions: In well-selected patients, chest wall resections for primary and secondary MCWTs are feasible and associated with good perioperative outcomes. For secondary MCWTs, surgery can also be performed with palliative intent.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据