4.7 Article

Cognitive constraints on vocal combinatoriality in a social bird

期刊

ISCIENCE
卷 26, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106977

关键词

artificial grammar

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A critical component of language is the ability to recombine sounds into larger structures. Animals' ability to generate meaning through reusing sound elements is limited to pairs of distinct elements, possibly due to the cognitive demands of processing complex sound sequences. Testing the chestnut crowned babblers, researchers found that the birds responded quicker and for longer to recombined bi-element sequences compared to familiar ones, but showed no differential responses to recombined tri-element sequences, suggesting a cognitively prohibitive jump in processing demands. Overcoming constraints in processing complex combinatorial signals was necessary for productive combinatoriality in language.
A critical component of language is the ability to recombine sounds into larger structures. Although animals also reuse sound elements across call combinations to generate meaning, examples are generally limited to pairs of distinct elements, even when repertoires contain sufficient sounds to generate hundreds of combinations. This combinatoriality might be constrained by the perceptual cognitive demands of disambiguating between complex sound sequences that share elements. We test this hypothesis by probing the capacity of chestnut crowned babblers to process combinations of two versus three distinct acoustic elements. We found babblers responded quicker and for longer toward playbacks of recombined versus familiar bi-element sequences, but no evidence of differential responses toward playbacks of recombined versus familiar tri-element sequences, suggesting a cognitively prohibitive jump in processing demands. We propose that overcoming constraints in the ability to process increasingly complex combinatorial signals was necessary for the productive combinatoriality that is characteristic of language to emerge.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据