4.7 Article

Ventrolateral periaqueductal gray GABAergic neurons promote arousal of sevoflurane anesthesia through cortico-midbrain circuit

期刊

ISCIENCE
卷 26, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107486

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mechanism of general anesthesia is still not well understood. However, recent studies have shown that the activity of GABA neurons in the ventrolateral periaque-ductal gray (vlPAG) decreases during sevoflurane anesthesia and is reactivated after anesthesia. Activating GABAergic neurons in vlPAG promotes arousal during anesthesia, while inhibiting them delays this process. Furthermore, cortico-midbrain circuits involving vlPAG GABAergic neurons and their projections to the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and ventral tegmental area (VTA) play an important role in the anesthesia-awake transition.
The mechanism of general anesthesia remains elusive. The ventrolateral periaque-ductal gray (vlPAG) in the midbrain regulates sleep and awake states. However, the role of vlPAG and its circuits in anesthesia is unclear. We utilized opto/chemogenetics, righting reflex, and electroencephalographic recording to assess consciousness changes. We employed fiber photometry to measure the activity of neurons and neurotransmitters. As a result, photometry recording showed that the activity of GABA neurons in vlPAG decreased during sevoflurane anesthesia and was reactivated after anesthesia. Activating GABAergic neurons in vlPAG promoted arousal during anesthesia, while inhibiting them delayed this process. Furthermore, medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) to vlPAG pyramidal neurons projections and vlPAG to ventral tegmental area (VTA) GABAergic projections played a prominent role in the anesthesia-awake transition. GABA neurotransmitter activity of VTA synchronized with mPFC-vlPAG pyramidal neuron projections. Therefore, the cortico-midbrain circuits centered on vlPAG GABAergic neurons exert an arousal-promoting effect during sevoflurane anesthesia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据