4.6 Article

Application of Real-Time PCR Assays for the Diagnosis of Histoplasmosis in Human FFPE Tissues Using Three Molecular Targets

期刊

JOURNAL OF FUNGI
卷 9, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jof9070700

关键词

histoplasmosis; Histoplasma capsulatum; diagnosis; real time PCR; FFPE tissues

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Histoplasmosis is a fungal infection caused by Histoplasma capsulatum, and it has a significant impact on HIV/AIDS patients, especially in resource-limited countries. Current diagnostic tests have limitations, and there is a lack of commercially available molecular assays. This study evaluated the use of real-time PCR targeting protein-coding genes for detecting Histoplasma capsulatum in FFPE samples, and found that the 100-kDa and H antigen assays showed reliable results for diagnosing this mycosis.
Histoplasmosis is a fungal infection caused by the thermally dimorphic fungus Histoplasma capsulatum. This infection causes significant morbidity and mortality in people living with HIV/AIDS, especially in countries with limited resources. Currently used diagnostic tests rely on culture and serology but with some limitations. No molecular assays are commercially available and the results from different reports have been variable. We aimed to evaluate quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) targeting three protein-coding genes of Histoplasma capsulatum (100-kDa, H and M antigens) for detection of this fungus in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples from patients with proven histoplasmosis. The sensitivity of 100-kDa, H and M qPCR assays were 93.9%, 91% and 57%, respectively. The specificity of 100-kDa qPCR was 93% when compared against samples from patients with other mycoses and other infections, and 100% when samples from patients with non-infectious diseases were used as controls. Our findings demonstrate that real-time PCR assays targeting 100-kDa and H antigen showed the most reliable results and can be successfully used for diagnosing this mycosis when testing FFPE samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据