4.7 Article

Exploring the Therapeutic Potential of Phosphorylated Cis-Tau Antibody in a Pig Model of Traumatic Brain Injury

期刊

BIOMEDICINES
卷 11, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11071807

关键词

traumatic brain injury; tau; phosphorylated tau; TBI; PNT001

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) leads to the production of tau protein. Targeting hyperphosphorylated tau (p-tau) could potentially provide new therapy for TBI. In a study involving pigs, treatment with PNT001, a monoclonal antibody for p-tau, showed significant improvement in white matter injury and neural injury biomarkers compared to placebo treatment.
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) results in the generation of tau. As hyperphosphorylated tau (p-tau) is one of the major consequences of TBI, targeting p-tau in TBI may lead to the development of new therapy. Twenty-five pigs underwent a controlled cortical impact. One hour after TBI, pigs were administered either vehicle (n = 13) or PNT001 (n = 12), a monoclonal antibody for the cis conformer of tau phosphorylated at threonine 231. Plasma biomarkers of neural injury were assessed for 14 days. Diffusion tensor imaging was performed at day 1 and 14 after injury, and these were compared to historical control animals (n = 4). The fractional anisotropy data showed significant white matter injury for groups at 1 day after injury in the corona radiata. At 14 days, the vehicle-treated pigs, but not the PNT001-treated animals, exhibited significant white matter injury compared to sham pigs in the ipsilateral corona radiata. The PNT001-treated pigs had significantly lower levels of plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) at day 2 and day 4. These findings demonstrate a subtle reduction in the areas of white matter injury and biomarkers of neurological injury after treatment with PNT001 following TBI. These findings support additional studies for PNT001 as well as the potential use of this agent in clinical trials in the near future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据