4.7 Article

Facile morphological tuning of thin film composite membranes for enhanced desalination performance

期刊

NPJ CLEAN WATER
卷 6, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41545-023-00271-9

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates a facile approach to fabricate a highly wrinkled selective layer on polyamide (PA) membranes through bio-inspired modification of the support layer with Y-type zeolites. Incorporating smaller dimension zeolites produced by a unique ball milling technique resulted in a defect-free selective layer. The membranes exhibited fast transport and excellent salt rejection for various salt solutions.
Polyamide (PA) membranes with a thin selective layer have been widely investigated for desalination and water treatment. Several modifications have been proposed over the years to tailor the morphology of such thin film composite (TFC) membranes by altering the support and/or selective layers to achieve superior performance. In this study, a facile approach towards fabricating a highly wrinkled selective layer has been demonstrated through bio-inspired modification of the support layer with Y-type zeolites. Results showed that incorporating zeolites in a smaller dimension (200 nm) produced by a unique ball milling technique is favorable for a defect-free selective layer in comparison to larger commercial zeolites. PA membranes formed by the interfacial polymerization (IP) of Piperazine (PIP) and 1,3,5-Benzenetricarbonyl trichloride (TMC) revealed highly wrinkled morphology due to the presence of zeolites in the TFC interlayer. At optimum fabrication conditions, the membrane exhibited a fast transport of 22.5 & PLUSMN; 2.2 Lm(-2)h(-1)bar(-1) with a salt rejection of 48.6, 91.3, 99.1, and 99.5% for NaCl, MgCl2, MgSO4, and Na2SO4, respectively. Besides the unique preparation of zeolites in smaller dimensions, the novelty of this study lies in the facile membrane pretreatment before IP to achieve wrinkled PA membranes for enhanced nanofiltration performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据