4.8 Article

Interfacial Engineering and Coupling of MXene/Reduced Graphene Oxide/C3N4 Aerogel with Optimized d-Band Center as a Free-Standing Sulfur Carrier for High-Performance Li-S Batteries

期刊

SMALL METHODS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smtd.202301102

关键词

d-band; free-standing cathodes; g-C3N4; Li-S batteries; MXenes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a free-standing sulfur carrier with high capture and catalytic effect towards polysulfides was developed. The MXene/reduced graphene oxide/C3N4 aerogel exhibited excellent performance in Li-S batteries, including high capacity, cycling stability, and rate capability.
To overcome the shuttle effect and improve the energy density of Li-S batteries, developing free-standing sulfur carriers with high capture and catalytic effect towards polysulfides is an effective strategy. Herein, a MXene/reduced graphene oxide/C3N4 aerogel (MG/C3N4) with three-dimensional architecture prepared through low-temperature hydrothermal approach followed by thermal treatment is used as sulfur carrier for free-standing cathode of Li-S batteries. In the MG/C3N4, MXene and rGO construct a highly conductive framework, and the MXene nanosheets offer chemical capture and catalytic activity towards lithium polysulfides, in favor of good cycling stability. The introduction of g-C3N4 further enhances the reactivity of C-Ti-N at the hetero-interface by engineering the electronic state of Ti atoms, leading to the optimized metal d-band for expediting the multistep conversion of sulfur electrochemistry. Therefore, the free-standing sulfur cathode with MG/C3N4 carrier achieves excellent performance with a capacity of 1315.6 mAh g(-1) at 0.2 C and a capacity retention of 97.5% after 100 cycles as well as superior rate capability with 1167.4 mAh g(-1) at 2 C. Even at a high sulfur loading of 4.92 mg cm(-2), the cathode remains 940.3 mAh g(-1) (4.62 mAh cm(-2)) after 200 cycles, indicating its promising potential for achieving high-performance Li-S batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据