4.7 Article

An Adaptive Ant Colony Optimization for Solving Large-Scale Traveling Salesman Problem

期刊

MATHEMATICS
卷 11, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/math11214439

关键词

meta-heuristic algorithm; adaptive optimization; traveling salesman problem; large-scale optimization; path optimization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The AACO-LST algorithm proposes solutions to the dimensional catastrophe problems by improving the state transfer rule and using a 2-opt operator for local optimization. It also introduces adaptive pheromone update rules to enhance search efficiency, resulting in improved solution quality and convergence speed.
The ant colony algorithm faces dimensional catastrophe problems when solving the large-scale traveling salesman problem, which leads to unsatisfactory solution quality and convergence speed. To solve this problem, an adaptive ant colony optimization for large-scale traveling salesman problem (AACO-LST) is proposed. First, AACO-LST improves the state transfer rule to make it adaptively adjust with the population evolution, thus accelerating its convergence speed; then, the 2-opt operator is used to locally optimize the part of better ant paths to further optimize the solution quality of the proposed algorithm. Finally, the constructed adaptive pheromone update rules can significantly improve the search efficiency and prevent the algorithm from falling into local optimal solutions or premature stagnation. The simulation based on 45 traveling salesman problem instances shows that AACO-LST improves the solution quality by 79% compared to the ant colony system (ACS), and in comparison with other algorithms, the PE of AACO-LST is not more than 1% and the Err is not more than 2%, which indicates that AACO-LST can find high-quality solutions with high stability. Finally, the convergence speed of the proposed algorithm was tested. The data shows that the average convergence speed of AACO-LST is more than twice that of the comparison algorithm. The relevant code can be found on our project homepage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据