4.7 Article

Main Physical Processes Affecting the Residence Times of a Micro-Tidal Estuary

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jmse11071333

关键词

residence time; estuarine hydrodynamics; water quality; particle tracking

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the main processes affecting the residence time of the Caloosahatchee River Estuary were identified and analyzed. The residence time showed a strong seasonality driven by the river discharge, and was influenced by wind velocity and direction. Water density gradient-induced circulation and particle buoyancy also played a role in determining the residence time. The outcomes of this study have implications for understanding residence time in other estuaries and improving water quality management.
Residence time is an important parameter linked to the water quality in an estuary. In this paper, we identify and analyze the main processes that affect the residence time of the Caloosahatchee River Estuary, a micro-tidal and mixed diurnal-semidiurnal estuary located in western Florida. Multiyear validated hydrodynamic hindcast results were coupled with an offline particle tracking model to compute the residence time of the estuary, which showed a strong seasonality driven by the river discharge. The residence time reduced with increasing river flow. The wind velocity and direction also affected the residence time. The influence of the wind was dependent on the magnitude of the river discharge. In general, upstream-directed wind increased residence time, while downstream-directed wind decreased residence time. Downstream wind during the dry period reduced residence time on average by a week. Processes such as water density gradient-induced circulation and particle buoyancy also influenced the residence time of the estuary. The outcomes of this study can be used to better understand the influence of the main physical processes affecting the residence time at other similar estuaries and to help in the management of the estuaries to improve their water quality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据