4.6 Article

Influence of Joule heating during single-cell electroporation simulation under IRE and H-FIRE pulses

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY COMMUNICATIONS
卷 36, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.106853

关键词

mu sPEFs; Electroporation; Joule heating; Pulse burst repetition frequency (PBRF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of Joule heating generated by pulsed electric fields on cell electroporation was investigated. It was found that considering Joule heating lowered the electroporation threshold, increased plasma membrane conductivity and pore number. Furthermore, the effect of pulse burst repetition frequency on cell electroporation was found to be non-monotonic.
Conventional irreversible electroporation (IRE) and high-frequency irreversible electroporation (H-FIRE) pulses have been widely employed in many biomedical and food applications. To investigate the effect of Joule heating generated by pulsed electric fields on cell electroporation, single-cell electroporation models without (EP only) and with the consideration of Joule heating (EP+T) were subjected to the equivalent energy IRE and H-FIRE pulses. The simulation results showed that with the consideration of Joule heating, the transmembrane voltage of the anodic point (TMPA) reached the electroporation threshold (similar to 1 V) faster, and a significant increase in the plasma membrane conductivity (sigma(A)) and pore number (k(p)) was found. We further evaluated the effect of the pulse burst repetition frequency (PBRF) of H-FIRE pulses on cell electroporation based on the EP+T model, and discovered k(p) increased with frequency when PBRF lower than 2 kHz, whereas it decreased with frequency for PBRF higher than 2 kHz. The accumulation of the ratio of the perforation area to the cell membrane area (sum of A(p)/A) during the 400th pulse was also reversed when PBRF was 2 kHz. Our results indicated that Joule heating generated by repetitive pulse delivery would facilitate electroporation, and the effect of PBRF on cell electroporation was non-monotonic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据