4.6 Article

Nucleation and growth of graphene at different temperatures by plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY COMMUNICATIONS
卷 36, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.106568

关键词

Graphene; PECVD; Nucleation; Growth temperature

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Temperature is a crucial factor in the synthesis of graphene by chemical vapor deposition. This study investigates the nucleation and growth of graphene at different temperatures using plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition. The results show that graphene nucleation and growth vary significantly in different temperature zones, with different growth forms observed in different temperature regions. The study proposes models to explain the nucleation and growth of graphene in these temperature zones.
Temperature plays an important role in the synthesis of graphene by chemical vapor deposition. In the low-temperature plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) process, although the cleavage of hydro-carbon precursor no longer depends on growth temperature, which can affect the nucleation and growth of graphene by the diffusion and adsorption of active species, the catalytic ability of substrate and other factors, and ultimately lead to various growth of graphene. In this paper, the nucleation and growth of graphene at different temperatures by PECVD were studied. We noted that the nucleation and growth of graphene varied greatly in different temperature zones. Graphene could not be grown at low temperatures (< 600 & DEG;C). At the medium and low temperature (650 -800 & DEG;C), high nucleation density of graphene with nanometer size were produced. In the middle and high temperature region (850 -900 & DEG;C), larger grains of graphene grown, and in the high tem-perature region (> 950 & DEG;C), the coexistence of large and small grains was finally formed. In addition, the models of the nucleation and growth of graphene in different temperature zones were proposed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据