4.7 Article

Clinical, magnetic resonance imaging, and histological description of a choroid plexus papilloma with disseminated intraventricular and spinal cerebrospinal fluid drop metastases in a young adult dog: a case report

期刊

FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1223729

关键词

choroid plexus tumor; choroid plexus papilloma; drop metastases; CSF; dogs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A 2-year-old male Cane Corso was euthanized due to a week-long history of ambulatory paraparesis and pelvic limb ataxia. MRI revealed intraventricular and spinal drop metastases. Histological examination confirmed a primary ventricular choroid plexus papilloma causing disseminated metastases. This is the first reported case of such occurrence.
A 2-year-old male entire Cane Corso was presented for investigations into a 1-week history of ambulatory paraparesis and pelvic limb ataxia gradually deteriorating. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed intraventricular space-occupying lesions affecting the fourth ventricle and lateral apertures and intradural-extramedullary space-occupying lesions at the level of C7 vertebra, L4-L5, and L7-S1 intervertebral disk spaces. Due to poor quality of life, the patient was euthanized. A post-mortem examination revealed partially encapsulated, multifocally infiltrative, and moderately cellular neoplastic masses. The histological description was similar for all masses. The cells appeared cuboidal with round central nuclei and a moderate amount of eosinophilic cytoplasm and were arranged almost exclusively in single-layered papilliform patterns supported by a fibrovascular stroma. Mitoses were rarely observed (1/2.37 mm(2)). The primary neoplasm was morphologically most consistent with a choroid plexus papilloma despite drop metastases. This is the first report of a histologically confirmed primary ventricular choroid plexus papilloma causing disseminated MRI-apparent intraventricular and spinal drop metastases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据