4.5 Article

Non-Native Decapods in South America: Risk Assessment and Potential Impacts

期刊

DIVERSITY-BASEL
卷 15, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/d15070841

关键词

biological invasions; crustaceans; niche modelling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study used ecological niche modeling to assess the ecological niche of five potentially invasive freshwater decapods in South America and evaluate the remaining suitable habitat areas for their occurrence. Results showed that approximately 11% of South America is suitable for the survival of these species. The information generated can help identify areas susceptible to decapod invasion in South America and support local management and decisions.
Biological invasions pose significant challenges in the Anthropocene, impacting ecosystem biodiversity and functioning. Ecological Niche Modeling is widely used to evaluate potential areas at risk of invasions, aiding in the prevention of invasive-species expansion and guiding conservation efforts in freshwater ecosystems. The main objectives of this study were to model the ecological niche and evaluate remaining suitable habitat areas for the occurrence of five potentially invasive species of freshwater decapods in South America: Dilocarcinus pagei, Macrobrachium amazonicum, M. jelskii, M. rosenbergii, and Procambarus clarkii. Occurrence data from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility were complemented with a literature systematic review. Variables used in the models were obtained from the Worldclim and EarthEv databases. Ecological Niche Modeling was performed using the Biomod2 and sdm package algorithms. Our results indicated a suitable area of up to 11% of South America. Model evaluations yielded favorable TSS and AUC values (>0.7 and >0.8). The suitable areas projected for South America included several hydrographic basins and Protected Areas. The information generated in our study can help identifying areas susceptible to decapod invasion in South America and support local management and decisions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据