4.7 Article

The spatial structure of correlated neuronal variability

期刊

NATURE NEUROSCIENCE
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 107-114

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nn.4433

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [NSF-DMS-1517828, NSF-DMS-1313225, NSF-DMS-1517082, NSF-DMS-1612913, NSF-DMS-1516288, NSF-DMS-1312508]
  2. National Institute of Health grants [R01 NS070865, CRCNS-R01DC015139, R01 EY016774, R01 EY022928, P3OEY008098]
  3. Simons Foundation collaboration on the global brain (SCGB) [325293MC, 364994AK]
  4. Eye and Ear Foundation of Pittsburgh
  5. Research to Prevent Blindness
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  7. Division Of Mathematical Sciences [1612913] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Division Of Mathematical Sciences
  9. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1517828] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Shared neural variability is ubiquitous in cortical populations. While this variability is presumed to arise from overlapping synaptic input, its precise relationship to local circuit architecture remains unclear. We combine computational models and in vivo recordings to study the relationship between the spatial structure of connectivity and correlated variability in neural circuits. Extending the theory of networks with balanced excitation and inhibition, we find that spatially localized lateral projections promote weakly correlated spiking, but broader lateral projections produce a distinctive spatial correlation structure: nearby neuron pairs are positively correlated, pairs at intermediate distances are negatively correlated and distant pairs are weakly correlated. This non-monotonic dependence of correlation on distance is revealed in a new analysis of recordings from superficial layers of macaque primary visual cortex. Our findings show that incorporating distance-dependent connectivity improves the extent to which balanced network theory can explain correlated neural variability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据