4.7 Article

Performance improvement of waste oyster-shell powder-cement binary system via carbonation curing

期刊

JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING
卷 70, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106336

关键词

Oyster shell powder (OSP); CO2 capture and storage; Carbonation curing; Compressive strength; Durability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The dumping of industrial waste oyster shells causes marine pollution and economic loss. Grinding and processing waste oyster shells into oyster shell powder (OSP) to substitute cement can reduce marine pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. Adding OSP to cement and curing it with CO2 improves the compressive strength and electrical resistivity, indicating the potential of OSP as a replacement material for cement and a solution for greenhouse gas reduction.
The dumping of significant amounts of industrial waste oyster shells causes marine pollution and economic loss. Grinding and processing waste oyster shells into oyster shell powder (OSP) to substitute a portion of cement can potentially reduce marine pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. Herein, 0, 15, and 30% OSP were added to cement and cured by employing different methods with and without CO2. The dilution effect of the OSP reduced the heat of hydration. The compressive strength and electrical resistivity of all the mixtures increased after carbonation curing compared to the seal cured specimens. The CO2 absorption contents and rate of carbon-ation increased with an increase in the OSP content. During carbonation curing, OSP contributes to the carbonation of the cement material, forming large amounts of carbonation products (calcite, aragonite, and vaterite). The precipitation of carbonation products acts as a pore filler, significantly increasing the mixture's performance more than seal curing. Therefore, OSP has significant potential as a replacement material for cement via carbonation curing, and its promising CO2 capture and storage capacities provide a viable solution for greenhouse gas reduction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据