4.6 Review

Non-Invasive Diagnostics of Male Spermatogenesis from Seminal Plasma: Seminal Proteins

期刊

DIAGNOSTICS
卷 13, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13152468

关键词

spermatozoa; azoospermia; sperm isolation; sperm analyses

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The compounds in seminal plasma have potential as biomarkers for male fertility and can be used for diagnosing different types of azoospermia. Distinguishing between obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia is important for effective treatment. Proteins in seminal plasma, particularly testicular and epididymal proteins, can serve as biomarkers for diagnosing azoospermia. Combining multiple biomarkers, such as TEX101 and ECM1 or TEX101 and SPAG1, can improve diagnostic accuracy.
The compounds of seminal plasma have great potential as biomarkers of male fertility and can be used as a diagnostic tool for types of azoospermia. Azoospermia occurs in approximately 1% of the male population, and for an effective therapy of this form of male infertility, it is important to distinguish between obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia. Proteins in seminal plasma can serve as biomarkers for diagnosing azoospermia. Considering the various types of obstructions, a combination of multiple proteins is advisable for diagnostic purposes. In this context, testicular and epididymal proteins are particularly significant, as they are specific to these tissues and typically absent in ejaculate during most obstructions. A combination of multiple biomarkers is more effective than the analysis of a single protein. This group of markers contains TEX101 and ECM1 proteins, combined detections of these two bring a diagnostic output with a high sensitivity and specificity. Similar results were observed for combined detection of TEX101 and SPAG1. The effective using of specific biomarkers from seminal plasma can significantly improve the existing approaches to diagnosis of the causes of male infertility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据