4.6 Article

Molecular Analysis of Biliary Tract Cancers with the Custom 3′ RACE-Based NGS Panel

期刊

DIAGNOSTICS
卷 13, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13203168

关键词

biliary tract cancer; cholangiocarcinoma; targeted RNA sequencing; 3'RACE; FGFR2 translocation; NGS library preparation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The combination of 3' RACE technology with targeted RNA sequencing panel is an efficient tool for molecular diagnostics of biliary tract carcinomas.
The technique 3' rapid amplification of cDNA ends (3 ' RACE) allows for detection of translocations with unknown gene partners located at the 3 ' end of the chimeric transcript. We composed a 3 ' RACE-based RNA sequencing panel for the analysis of FGFR1-4 gene rearrangements, detection of activating mutations located within FGFR1-4, IDH1/2, ERBB2 (HER2), KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA genes, and measurement of the expression of ERBB2, PD-L1, and FGFR1-4 transcripts. This NGS panel was utilized for the molecular profiling of 168 biliary tract carcinomas (BTCs), including 83 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (iCCAs), 44 extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (eCCAs), and 41 gallbladder adenocarcinomas (GBAs). The NGS failure rate was 3/168 (1.8%). iCCAs, but not other categories of BTCs, were characterized by frequent FGFR2 alterations (17/82, 20.7%) and IDH1/2 mutations (23/82, 28%). Other potentially druggable events included ERBB2 amplifications or mutations (7/165, 4.2% of all successfully analyzed BTCs) and BRAF p.V600E mutations (3/165, 1.8%). In addition to NGS, we analyzed microsatellite instability (MSI) using the standard five markers and revealed this event in 3/158 (1.9%) BTCs. There were no instances of ALK, ROS1, RET, and NTRK1-3 gene rearrangements or MET exon 14 skipping mutations. Parallel analysis of 47 iCCA samples with the Illumina TruSight Tumor 170 kit confirmed good performance of our NGS panel. In conclusion, targeted RNA sequencing coupled with the 3 ' RACE technology is an efficient tool for the molecular diagnostics of BTCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据