4.6 Article

Binding of Stimuli-Responsive Ruthenium Aqua Complexes with 9-Ethylguanine

期刊

ACS OMEGA
卷 8, 期 40, 页码 37391-37401

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.3c05343

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study experimentally investigated the formation of adducts between stimuli-responsive ruthenium complexes and a model DNA base. The results showed that these complexes can undergo isomerization and adduct formation under certain temperatures. Additionally, there was a difference in the rate of adduct formation between different complexes, which may be attributed to intramolecular hydrogen bonding and steric hindrance.
Stimuli-responsive ruthenium complexes proximal- and distal-[Ru-(C(10)tpy)(C(10)pyqu) OH2](2+) (proximal-1 and distal-1; C(10)tpy = 4'-decyloxy-2,2':6' ,2?-terpyridine and C(10)pyqu = 2-[2'-(6'-decyloxy)-pyridyl]quinoline) were experimentally studied for adduct formation with a model DNA base. At 303 K, proximal-1 exhibited 1:1 adduct formation with 9-ethylguanine (9-EtG) to yield proximal-[Ru(C(10)tpy)(C(10)pyqu)(9-EtG)](2+) (proximal-RuEtG). Rotation of the guanine ligand on the ruthenium center was sterically hindered by the presence of an adjacent quinoline moiety at 303 K. Results from 1H NMR measurements indicated that photoirradiation of a proximal-RuEtG solution caused photo-isomerization to distal-RuEtG, whereas heating of proximal-RuEtG caused ligand substitution to proximal-1. The distal isomer of the aqua complex, distal-1, was observed to slowly revert to proximal-1 at 303 K. In the presence of 9-EtG, distal-1 underwent thermal back-isomerization to proximal-1 and adduct formation to distal- RuEtG. Kinetic analysis of H-1 NMR measurements showed that adduct formation between proximal-1 and 9-EtG was 8-fold faster than that between distal-1 and 9-EtG. This difference may be attributed to intramolecular hydrogen bonding and steric repulsion between the aqua ligand and the pendant moiety of the bidentate ligand..

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据