4.6 Article

Study on a Novel Methodology for Developing the Skeletal Mechanism of RP-3 Aviation Kerosene

期刊

ACS OMEGA
卷 8, 期 40, 页码 37282-37292

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.3c05087

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a novel methodology for developing a simplified mechanism for high-carbon fuels, by combining detailed mechanisms for carbon chains C-0-C-4 and high-carbon molecular skeleton. The accuracy of the developed mechanism was validated by examining the combustion characteristics of different fuel components and aviation kerosene. The proposed methodology offers a new approach for developing mechanisms for high-carbon fuels.
An urgent requirement for high-precision numerical simulation of modern aero-engines is the development of a highly simplified and accurate reaction mechanism for aviation kerosene. However, there is still lack of a reduced mechanism that can effectively capture the low- and high-temperature characteristics of RP-3 aviation kerosene. In light of this, in this study, a novel methodology for developing skeletal mechanism by combining the detailed C-0-C-4 mechanism and C-5-C-n high-carbon molecular skeletal mechanism was proposed and applied. To construct the RP-3 skeletal mechanism, a surrogate fuel consisting of 54% n-dodecane, 22% 2,5-dimethylhexane, 14% 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene, and 10% decalin was utilized. Based on the proposed methodology, a skeletal mechanism comprising 153 species and 858 reactions has been developed. Various combustion characteristics of each surrogate component and the RP-3 aviation kerosene, such as the ignition delay, concentration of material components, laminar flame, and NO emission, were examined to validate the developed mechanism. The proposed methodology in this study offers a novel approach to develop mechanisms for high-carbon fuels. Additionally, the developed skeletal mechanism serves as a foundation for the design and optimization of aero-engines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据