4.6 Article

First-Principles Study on the Electronic and Mechanical Properties of the Cr(001)/Al(001) Structure

期刊

ACS OMEGA
卷 8, 期 45, 页码 42840-42848

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.3c05827

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we used spin-polarized density functional theory to analyze the properties of the Cr(001)/Al(001) structure, and found that the interface can be classified into three forms: bcc, bridge, and top. The total density of states of the structures is mainly influenced by the Cr (d) orbitals. The analysis of the mechanical properties showed that deformation mainly occurs in the Al region regardless of the interface type.
We utilized spin-polarized density functional theory to analyze the properties of the Cr(001)/Al(001) structure. The interface was classified into three forms-bcc, bridge, and top-based on the bonding coordinates between Cr and Al atoms. The total density of states (DOS) of the structures is mainly influenced by the Cr (d) orbitals. The local DOS of the Cr atoms at the interface exhibits slight variations based on their coordination with neighboring Al atoms. The mechanical properties of a specific layer were analyzed by using the rigid grain shift (RGS) method, and the properties of all layers were analyzed by using the homogeneous lattice extension method. Our results confirmed that the bonding strength, as determined by the RGS method, follows a decreasing order from the strongest to the weakest: bcc, bridge, and top. We applied uniform deformation to the entire system in the thickness direction and allowed it to relax: we observed that deformation occurs mainly in the Al region and ultimately leads to failure regardless of the type of interface. Consequently, similar strain-stress curves were observed in all Cr(001)/Al(001) structures. The failure in the Al region is attributed to the lower stiffness of the Al-Al layers compared to the top interface despite the lower work of separation for the top interface.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据