4.6 Article

Crosstalk between Aldosterone and Glycation through Rac-1 Induces Diabetic Nephropathy

期刊

ACS OMEGA
卷 8, 期 40, 页码 37264-37273

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.3c05085

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that Aldo has a significant impact on glycation, and the AGEs-Aldo complex induces inflammatory responses through RAGE-MR interaction in DN.
Background: Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) interaction with its receptor (RAGE) and aldosterone (Aldo) through the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) activates Rac-1 and NF-kappa B independently in diabetic nephropathy (DN). However, the crosstalk of Aldo with AGEs-RAGE is still unresolved. Our study examined the impact of the AGEs-Aldo complex on renal cells and its effect on the RAGE-MR interaction. Methods and results: Glycation of human serum albumin (HSA) (40 mg/mL) with methylglyoxal (10 mM) in the presence of Aldo (100 nM) and aminoguanidine (AG) (100 nM) was performed. Glycation markers such as fructosamine and carbonyl groups and fluorescence of AGEs, pentosidine, and tryptophan followed by protein modification were measured. Renal (HEK-293T) cells were treated with the glycated HSA-Aldo (200 mu g/mL) along with FPS-ZM1 and spironolactone antagonists for RAGE and Aldo, respectively, for 24 h. Glycation markers and esRAGE levels were measured. Protein and mRNA levels of RAGE, MR, Rac-1, and NF-kappa B were estimated. Glycation markers were enhanced with Aldo when albumin was only 14-16% glycated. AGEs-Aldo complex upregulated RAGE, MR, Rac-1 and NF-kappa B expressions. However, FPS-ZM1 action might have activated the RAGE-independent pathway, further elevating MR, Rac-1, and NF-kappa B levels. Conclusion: Our study concluded that the presence of Aldo has a significant impact on glycation. In the presence of AGEs-Aldo, RAGE-MR crosstalk exerts inflammatory responses through Rac-1 in DN. Insights into this molecular interplay are crucial for developing novel therapeutic strategies to alleviate DN in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据