4.6 Article

PEGylated Chitosan Nanoparticles Loaded with Betaine and Nedaplatin Hamper Breast Cancer: In Vitro and In Vivo Studies

期刊

ACS OMEGA
卷 8, 期 44, 页码 41485-41494

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.3c05359

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the anticancer effects of PEGylated chitosan nanoparticles co-loaded with betaine and nedaplatin on breast adenocarcinoma cells and breast cancer-bearing rats. The results showed that the PEGylated nanoparticles had high encapsulation efficiency and reduced the viability of tumor cells by releasing their contents. Among the nanoparticles, those containing both betaine and nedaplatin exhibited the strongest anticancer effect.
The current study investigates the anticancer effects of PEGylated chitosan nanoparticles (CS NPs) coloaded with betaine (BT) and nedaplatin (ND) on breast adenocarcinoma (MCF-7) cells and breast cancer-bearing rats. Hereof, the ionotropic gelation approach was implemented for the synthesis of PEG-uncoated and PEG-coated CS NPs encompassing either BT, ND, or both (BT-ND). The sizes of the developed BT/CS NPs, ND/CS NPs, and BT-ND/CS NPs were 176.84 +/- 7.45, 204.1 +/- 13.6, and 201.1 +/- 23.35 nm, respectively. Meanwhile, the sizes of the synthesized BT/PEG-CS NPs, ND/PEG-CS NPs, and BT-ND/PEG-CS NPs were 165.1 +/- 32.40, 148.2 +/- 20.98, and 143.7 +/- 7.72 nm, respectively. The surface charges of the fabricated nanoparticles were considerably high. All of the synthesized nanoparticles displayed a spherical form and significant entrapment efficiency. Release experiments demonstrated that the PEGylated and non-PEGylated CS NPs could discharge their contents into the tumor cells' microenvironments (pH 5.5). In addition, the NPs demonstrated an outstanding ability to reduce the viability of the MCF-7 cell line. In addition, BT-ND/PEG-CS NPs were found to be the strongest among all NP preparations, where they caused around 90% decrease in the size of mammary gland tumors in rats compared to vehicle-treated animals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据