4.6 Article

Zirconium Coordination Chemistry and Its Role in Optimizing Hydroxymate Chelation: Insights from Molecular Dynamics

期刊

ACS OMEGA
卷 8, 期 39, 页码 36032-36042

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.3c04083

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent years, the use of Zirconium-89 (Zr-89) as a radionuclide in nuclear medicine for cancer diagnostic imaging and drug discovery has increased. Our research reveals a different coordination structure of the Zr-DFO complex, which is contrary to the conventional belief. Through molecular dynamics simulations and free energy calculations, we find that thermal fluctuations lead to an open hexadentate chelate structure of the Zr-DFO complex, while a stable and closely packed structure is formed by binding with 4HMS.
In the past decade, there has been a growth in using Zirconium-89 (Zr-89) as a radionuclide in nuclear medicine for cancer diagnostic imaging and drug discovery processes. Although one of the most popular chelators for( 89)Zr, desferrioxamine (DFO) is typically presented as a hexadentate ligand, our work suggests a different scenario. The coordination structure of the Zr4+-DFO complex has primarily been informed by DFT-based calculations, which typically ignore temperature and therefore entropic and dynamic solvent effects. In this work, free energy calculations using molecular dynamics simulations, where the conformational fluctuations of both the ligand and the solvent are explicitly included, are used to compare the binding of Zr4+ cations with two different chelators, DFO and 4HMS, the latter of which is an octadentate ligand that has been recently proposed as a better chelator due to the presence of four hydroxymate groups. We find that thermally induced disorder leads to an open hexadentate chelate structure of the Zr4+-DFO complex, leaving the Zr4+ metal exposed to the solvent. A stable coordination of Zr4+ with 4HMS, however, is formed by involving both hydroxamate groups and water molecules in a more closely packed structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据