4.7 Review

A Systematic Review on the Therapeutic Effects of Ayahuasca

期刊

PLANTS-BASEL
卷 12, 期 13, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants12132573

关键词

ayahuasca; therapeutic properties; natural treatments; systematic review

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Traditional therapies using plants have gained popularity due to economic motives and preference for natural treatments. Ayahuasca, according to studies, may offer beneficial effects in treating physical and psychological imbalances. This systematic review of studies published until December 2022 found 66 publications supporting the therapeutic potential of ayahuasca in conditions like depression, anxiety, neurobiological diseases, inflammation, and microbial infections.
Traditional therapies, resorting to the use of plants, have acquired a great demand over the years, both for economic reasons and the preference for natural treatments. Some studies suggest that ayahuasca may have beneficial properties in treating some physical and psychological imbalances. Thus, we carried out a systematic review of studies published up to December 2022, where these themes were addressed. The search was carried out in the PubMed database, and only studies written in English and published in peer-reviewed journals were included. Thus, 228 publications were identified, of which 66 were included in the present study. The reviewed studies suggest that ayahuasca may have beneficial effects on various physical and psychological conditions, namely in the treatment of depression, anxiety and various diseases of the neurobiological system, as well as anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial properties, demonstrating its therapeutic potential. The number of studies that address this issue has also been growing, demonstrating interest in the search for alternative treatments. However, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic review where all the findings of therapeutic effects associated with the consumption of ayahuasca are reviewed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据