4.7 Article

The Potential of Myrtaceae Species for the Phytomanagement of Treated Municipal Wastewater

期刊

PLANTS-BASEL
卷 12, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants12152844

关键词

biowaste; Kunzea robusta; land treatment; Leptospermum scoparium; native vegetation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research on the potential of native species to manage nutrients and contaminants in treated municipal wastewater is limited. In a 10-hectare field site, the distribution of nutrients and trace elements in the soil-plant system was investigated, comparing native Myrtaceae species with pasture. Results showed that plant growth was not influenced by wastewater irrigation rates. Myrtaceae species had higher foliar trace element concentrations, but pasture accumulated more nitrogen and phosphorus.
The use of native plants in land application systems for treated municipal wastewater (TMW) can contribute to ecological restoration. However, research on the potential of native species to manage the nutrients and contaminants contained in TMW is scarce. At a 10-hectare field site irrigated with TMW at >4000 mm yr(-1), we investigated the distribution of nutrients and trace elements in the soil-plant system, comparing the New Zealand native Myrtaceae species Leptosperum scoparium and Kunzea robusta with pasture. The results showed that plant growth did not correlate with TMW irrigation rates. L. scoparium and K. robusta had higher foliar trace element concentrations than pasture, but these were not correlated with TMW irrigation rates. The pasture accumulated more N and P (68 kg of N ha(-1) yr(-1) and 11 kg of P ha(-1) yr(-1)) than the Myrtaceae species (0.6-17 kg of N ha(-1) yr(-1) and 0.06-1.8 kg of P ha(-1) yr(-1)). Regular harvesting of the pasture would likely remove more N and P from the site than the Myrtaceae species. The results highlight the importance of adjusting TMW application rates to the soil-plant capacity, in which case, native plants could provide ecological or economic value to TMW-irrigated land.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据