4.7 Review

Recent Updates on ALMT Transporters' Physiology, Regulation, and Molecular Evolution in Plants

期刊

PLANTS-BASEL
卷 12, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants12173167

关键词

ALMT; anion channel; aluminium tolerance; malate transport; STOP1; phosphate deficiency

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aluminium toxicity and phosphorus deficiency are major interconnected problems in modern agriculture. The ALMT family of membrane proteins in plants have been extensively studied for their physiological functions, such as tolerance to Al3+ and regulation of stomatal movement. This review provides a comprehensive summary of the current knowledge on ALMT proteins, their involvement in various physiological processes, and the regulatory mechanisms. The authors also present new insights into the molecular evolution of ALMT proteins and propose future research directions.
Aluminium toxicity and phosphorus deficiency in soils are the main interconnected problems of modern agriculture. The aluminium-activated malate transporters (ALMTs) comprise a membrane protein family that demonstrates various physiological functions in plants, such as tolerance to environmental Al3+ and the regulation of stomatal movement. Over the past few decades, the regulation of ALMT family proteins has been intensively studied. In this review, we summarise the current knowledge about this transporter family and assess their involvement in diverse physiological processes and comprehensive regulatory mechanisms. Furthermore, we have conducted a thorough bioinformatic analysis to decipher the functional importance of conserved residues, structural components, and domains. Our phylogenetic analysis has also provided new insights into the molecular evolution of ALMT family proteins, expanding their scope beyond the plant kingdom. Lastly, we have formulated several outstanding questions and research directions to further enhance our understanding of the fundamental role of ALMT proteins and to assess their physiological functions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据