4.7 Article

Alternaria arborescens and A. italica Causing Leaf Blotch on Celtis julianae in China

期刊

PLANTS-BASEL
卷 12, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants12173113

关键词

Celtis julianae; Alternaria; multi-locus phylogeny; new disease; identification

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A leaf blotch disease of Celtis julianae was identified in Nanjing, China, in September 2022, with an infection incidence of 63%. The pathogen was confirmed to be Alternaria arborescens and A. italica through morphological and molecular analyses. This research provides valuable insights into disease management and the diversity of Alternaria species in China.
Celtis julianae Schneid. is widely planted as a versatile tree species with ecological and economic significance. In September 2022, a leaf blotch disease of C. julianae was observed in Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, with an infection incidence of 63%. The disease led to severe early defoliation, significantly affecting the ornamental and ecological value of the host tree. The accurate identification of pathogens is imperative to conducting further research and advancing disease control. Koch's postulates confirmed that the fungal isolates (B1-B9) were pathogenic to C. julianae. The morphology of the characteristics of the pathogen matched those of Alternaria spp. The internal transcribed spacer region (ITS), large subunit (LSU) and small subunit (SSU) regions of rRNA, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), Alternaria major allergen gene (Alt a 1), RNA polymerase second largest subunit (RPB2), and portions of translation elongation factor 1-alpha (TEF1-a) genes were sequenced. Based on multi-locus phylogenetic analyses and morphology, the pathogenic fungi were identified as Alternaria arborescens and A. italica. The findings provided useful information for disease management and enhanced the understanding of Alternaria species diversity in China. This is the first report of A. arborescens and A. italica causing leaf blotch of C. julianae in China and worldwide.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据