4.6 Article

Spatial variation in landscape evolution of the Xiaojiang Region, SE Tibetan Plateau

期刊

FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/feart.2023.1129217

关键词

landscape evolution; Xiaojiang region; geomorphic indices; river longitudinal profiles; tectonics; erosion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By measuring river profiles and studying the spatial variation in geomorphic indices, it is concluded that tectonics play a more dominant role than erosion in shaping and evolving the landscape of the Xiaojiang Region.
Both tectonism and erosion are presumed to have influenced the landscape evolution of the Xiaojiang Region, SE Tibetan Plateau. However, it remains unclear which of these broad processes has played the dominant role in determining landscape form and evolution. To establish the relative importance of these two processes, we measured river longitudinal profiles and spatial variation in selected geomorphic indices within the region. We measured longitudinal profiles along four large rivers from north to south through the region and also measured drainage basin asymmetry, basin shape index, hypsometric integral, normalized stream-length gradient index, and the ratio of valley-floor width to valley height of 77 drainage basins in this region. The four longitudinal profiles reveal that tectonic activity decreases from north to south. Spatial variation in geomorphic indices reflects that the topography in the Xiaojiang Region may be primarily influenced by three major faults: the Xiaojiang fault, the Shiping fault, and the Qujiang fault, rather than influenced by precipitation, lithology, and drainage reorganization. The tectonic activity in different parts of the region shows that the northern part is the most active, the central part is the least active, and the southern part is moderately active. It is concluded that the spatial variation in landscape form and evolution of the Xiaojiang Region has been influenced more strongly by tectonics than by erosion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据