4.7 Article

Combining High-Pressure Processing and Supercritical Carbon Dioxide for Inactivation of Listeria innocua

期刊

FOODS
卷 12, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods12193563

关键词

high-pressure processing; supercritical carbon dioxide; Listeria innocua

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of high-pressure treatment with supercritical CO2 on the inactivation of Listeria innocua in fish soup was investigated. The study found that higher pressure, temperature, and CO2 levels resulted in more significant inactivation of L. innocua. Additionally, the combination of high pressure and CO2 levels inhibited the recovery of L. innocua.
The effect of high-pressure treatment with supercritical CO2 on the inactivation of Listeria innocua in a fish soup was investigated. The soup was inoculated with L. innocua, packaged in modified atmosphere with 50:50 or 95:5 CO2:N-2, high-pressure processed (300, 350, 400 and 600 MPa, 2 min) under subcritical (T < 304 K) or supercritical conditions (T > 304 K) and stored at 4 C-degrees for up to 53 days. Treatment at 400 and 600 MPa had a significant (p < 0.05) effect on L. innocua under both supercritical and subcritical conditions. In contrast, pressurization at 350 MPa and supercritical conditions were needed to significantly (p < 0.05) inactive L. innocua. Increased levels of CO2 in the headspace significantly (p < 0.05) reduced the bacterial load during processing, and supercritical conditions had a significant (p < 0.01) interaction with both CO2 levels and pressure. Increased storage time gave significantly increased levels of L. innocua at 400 and 600 MPa. In addition, high levels of CO2 significantly decreased (p < 0.001) growth. However, 350 MPa under supercritical conditions seemed to set the L. innocua in a permanent lag phase, with slow and steadily decreasing numbers of bacteria during storage. All the design variables resulted in significant inactivation of L. innocua, and supercritical conditions combined with high levels of CO2 inhibited the recovery of L. innocua to a large degree.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据