4.8 Article

Negating interfacial impedance in garnet-based solid-state Li metal batteries

期刊

NATURE MATERIALS
卷 16, 期 5, 页码 572-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NMAT4821

关键词

-

资金

  1. US Department of Energy ARPA-E [DE-AR0000384]
  2. US Department of Energy EERE [DE-EE0006860]
  3. Maryland NanoCenter and its FabLab and AIMLab
  4. National Science Foundation [DMR150038]
  5. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DESC0001160]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Garnet-type solid-state electrolytes have attracted extensive attention due to their high ionic conductivity, approaching 1mS cm(-1), excellent environmental stability, and wide electrochemical stability window, from lithium metal to similar to 6V. However, to date, there has been little success in the development of high-performance solid-state batteries using these exceptional materials, the major challenge being the high solid-solid interfacial impedance between the garnet electrolyte and electrode materials. In this work, we effectively address the large interfacial impedance between a lithium metal anode and the garnet electrolyte using ultrathin aluminium oxide (Al2O3) by atomic layer deposition. Li7La2.75Ca0.25Zr1.75Nb0.25O12 (LLCZN) is the garnet composition of choice in this work due to its reduced sintering temperature and increased lithium ion conductivity. A significant decrease of interfacial impedance, from 1,710 Omega cm(2) to 1 Omega cm(2), was observed at room temperature, effectively negating the lithium metal/garnet interfacial impedance. Experimental and computational results reveal that the oxide coating enables wetting of metallic lithium in contact with the garnet electrolyte surface and the lithiated-alumina interface allows effective lithium ion transport between the lithium metal anode and garnet electrolyte. We also demonstrate a working cell with a lithium metal anode, garnet electrolyte and a high-voltage cathode by applying the newly developed interface chemistry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据