4.6 Article

Foreign body aspiration and mucormycosis: a case report

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1273240

关键词

COVID-19; mucormycosis; foreign body aspiration; hemoptysis; rigid bronchoscopy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This report details an unexpected complication of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a 73-year-old female patient who was also afflicted with mucormycosis and another unanticipated problem. A foreign body was discovered during bronchoscopy, which was found to be the cause of the patient's persistent symptoms. The presence of the foreign body may have influenced the suboptimal therapeutic outcome, as antifungal therapy was not effective. Additionally, the atypical imaging findings further complicated the diagnostic process for this invasive fungal infection.
Over the course of the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, numerous complications have been documented. In this report, we have detailed an unexpected complication of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection that occurred in a 73-year-old female patient who was simultaneously afflicted with mucormycosis and another unanticipated problem. Due to the lack of recovery of the patient after receiving mucormycosis treatment and continued fever, cough and hemoptysis, bronchoscopy was performed for her. During bronchoscopy, we encountered a foreign body that was the cause of the patient's fever, cough, and hemoptysis. Rigid bronchoscopy was performed and the foreign body was removed from the left main bronchus. The lack of a favorable treatment response after administering antifungal therapy suggested that the presence of a foreign body could potentially act as an underlying nidus, thus influencing the suboptimal therapeutic outcome. Mucormycosis is usually characterized by distinct radiological patterns. However, this case did not present predictable imaging findings, further complicating the diagnostic process associated with this invasive fungal infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据