4.7 Article

Efficient magnetic flocculation for microalgae harvesting using a novel composite flocculant of Fe3O4-based starch-grafted-cationic polyacrylamide

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.104121

关键词

Algae; Cationic starch; Magnetic flocculation; Harvesting efficiency; Water reuse

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a novel magnetic starch-grafted-cationic polyacrylamide composite (MAG@ST-g-CPAM) was developed as a flocculant for algae harvesting. The efficiency of the composite was compared to other flocculants, and the optimal feeding ratios and impacting factors were determined. The MAG@ST-g-CPAM flocculant showed superior harvesting efficiencies and facilitated water reuse through the elimination of fulvic acids.
As a flocculant for algae harvesting, a novel magnetic starch-grafted-cationic polyacrylamide composite (MAG@ST-g-CPAM) was developed in this study, and the harvesting efficiency of the composite was assessed with comparison to starch, Fe3O4 magnetite nanoparticles, cationic polyacrylamide and starch-grafted-cationic polyacrylamide. The feeding ratios for flocculant synthesis were optimized, and impacting factors were examined. Magnetic particles were recovered for cyclic use, and the effect of MAG@ST-g-CPAM flocculation on water reuse was examined. The results showed that MAG@ST-g-CPAM flocculation successfully achieved harvesting efficiencies of 93.2 % and 97.3 % at doses of 25 mg/L and 30 mg/L, respectively, which were superior to those of other flocculants. The optimized feeding ratio of acrylamide:Fe3O4:starch was 6:4:3. The late exponential algal growth solution with a pH range of 5-6 was most favorable for algae flocculation. A total of 93.7 % of Fe3O4 magnetite nanoparticles was recovered at pH = 3, and flocculation facilitated the reuse of water by effectively eliminating fulvic acids from the culture solution. This study demonstrated that MAG@ST-g-CPAM is a promising flocculant for algae harvesting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据