4.7 Review

A review of anaerobic granulation under high-salinity conditions: Mechanisms, influencing factors and enhancement strategies

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.104227

关键词

High salinity inhibition; UASB; Microbial community; Granulation; Enhancement strategies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reviews the effects of high salinity on microbial communities and granulation process in anaerobic treatment of high-salinity wastewater. Various strategies, such as inoculation of adaptive sludge, addition of exogenous substances, and conductive materials, have been adopted to improve microbial community structure, promote methane production, and enhance granulation to some extent.
Anaerobic biological treatment of high-salinity wastewater has attracted much attention due to its environmental and economic benefits. However, the granulation can be significantly inhibited by a certain concentration of high salinity, which leads to the poor reactor performance and process stability. The presence of high salinity can also alter the structure of microbial communities and reshape the bacteria-archaea community. In this paper, the effects of high salinity on microbial communities in up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) and the inhibition on the anaerobic granulation were reviewed. The effects of different salinities, substrate species and acclimation on the performance for treating high-salinity wastewaters were discussed. In this context, researches have adopted a variety of improvement and enhancement strategies, such as inoculation of adaptive sludge, addition of exogenous substances, addition of conductive materials, etc., which could improve microbial community structure, promote methane production, and enhance granulation to a certain extent. Finally, this paper offered prospects for some specific research topics, such as the culture of salt-tolerant microorganisms and the addition of exogenous substances, to provide theoretical direction for achieving better engineering applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据