4.7 Article

Optimization of biological enzymes combined with Fe2+-activated advanced oxidation process for waste activated sludge conditioning using the response surface method

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.103634

关键词

Sludge conditioning; Bio-enzyme; Advanced oxidation process; Response surface method; Dewaterability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The feasibility of using bio-enzymes with Fe2+-activated advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) for waste activated sludge (WAS) conditioning was investigated. Results showed that neutral protease combined with the Fe2+/Ca(ClO)2 system performed better in CST and SRF reduction rates while reducing the AOPs dosages. Under the optimal conditions, the reduction in sludge CST and SRF reached 84.81% and 94.06% respectively. The neutral protease with the Fe2+/Ca(ClO)2 system was a potential method for improving sludge dewatering performance.
Waste activated sludge (WAS) conditioning is crucial for enhancing sludge dewaterability and effectively reducing the management cost. The feasibility of bio-enzymes with Fe2+-activated advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) for WAS conditioning was investigated in this study. Two representative bio-enzymes, alpha-amylase and neutral protease, and two typical AOPs, the Fenton system and Fe2+/Ca(ClO)2 system, were chosen. The medical dosages of AOPs were first optimized by single-factor experiments. On this basis, the dosages of bio-enzyme, ferrous ion, and oxidant were optimized using the response surface method (RSM). Results showed that neutral protease combined with the Fe2+/Ca(ClO)2 system performed better in CST and SRF reduction rates while reducing the medical dosages of AOPs. Under the optimal conditions of neutral protease dosage of 20.9 mg/g TSS, Fe2+ dosage of 0.64 mmol/g TSS, and Ca(ClO)2 dosage of 0.54 mmol/g TSS, the reduction in sludge CST and SRF reached 84.81 % and 94.06 %, respectively. The neutral protease with the Fe2+/Ca(ClO)2 system was a potential method for improving sludge dewatering performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据