4.5 Article

HPV16 Impacts NHERF2 Expression in Oropharyngeal Cancers

期刊

PATHOGENS
卷 12, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pathogens12081013

关键词

HNSCC; OPSCC; HPV; E6; p16; NHERF2

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Infection with human papillomaviruses (HPVs), especially type 16, is a key risk factor for a subset of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCC) that differ from HPV-negative (HPV-) OPSCCs. However, distinguishing these two entities and developing different therapies has proven challenging. This study found that HPV16+ and poorly differentiated HPV- OPSCCs had significantly lower levels of NHERF2, suggesting the importance of HPV16 E6's targeting of NHERF2 in the development of HPV-driven OPSCCs.
Infection with human papillomaviruses (HPVs), in particular with HPV type 16, is now considered to be a key risk factor for the development of a subset of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCC) that show different epidemiological, clinical, and prognostic characteristics from HPV-negative (HPV-) OPSCCs. So far, extensive research efforts aiming to distinguish these two distinct entities have not identified specific biomarkers, nor led to different therapies. Previous research has shown that HPV16 E6 oncoprotein binds NHERF2, inducing its proteasomal degradation, and consequently increasing cell proliferation; we therefore aimed to investigate how this might be reflected in human histological samples. We analyzed NHERF2 expression patterns in HPV16-positive (HPV16+) and HPV- OPSCC samples, to investigate any potential differences in NHERF2 pattern. Interestingly, we observed a statistically significant decrease in NHERF2 levels in HPV16+ and poorly differentiated HPV- OPSCCs, compared with healthy tissue. Furthermore, we observed a significant reduction in the percentage of NHERF2 immunoreactive cancer cells in HPV16+ tumors, compared with well and moderately differentiated HPV- OPSCCs, suggesting the importance of 16E6's targeting of NHERF2 in HPV-driven oncogenesis in the head and neck area.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据