4.5 Article

Molecular Epidemiology of Streptococcus pneumoniae Detected in Hospitalized Pediatric Acute Respiratory Infection Cases in Central Vietnam

期刊

PATHOGENS
卷 12, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pathogens12070943

关键词

Streptococcus pneumoniae; antibiotic resistance; penicillin-binding proteins; macrolide genes; multi-locus typing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A study conducted in Nha Trang, Vietnam, found that Streptococcus pneumoniae is the main cause of high pneumonia morbidity and mortality in children. The study showed that children attending school and older children were more likely to be infected with S. pneumoniae. The study also identified common serotypes and high resistance to certain antibiotics, as well as a high genetic diversity among the isolates.
Streptococcus pneumoniae is the major bacterial pathogen causing high pneumonia morbidity and mortality in children S. pneumoniae detected among hospitalized pediatric ARI cases at Khanh Hoa General Hospital, Nha Trang, Vietnam, from October 2015 to September 2016 (pre-PCV). We performed semi-quantitative culture to isolate S. pneumoniae. Serotyping, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, resistance gene detection and multi-locus sequence typing were also performed. During the study period, 1300 cases were enrolled and 413 (31.8%) S. pneumoniae were isolated. School attendance, age S. pneumoniae isolation. Major serotypes were 6A/B (35.9%), 19F (23.7%) and 23F (12.7%), which accounted for 80.3% of vaccine-type pneumococci. High resistance to Clarithromycin, Erythromycin and Clindamycin (86.7%, 85%, 78.2%) and the mutant drug-resistant genes pbp1A (98.1%), pbp2b (98.8%), pbp2x (99.6%) ermB (96.6%) and mefA (30.3%) were detected. MLST data showed high genetic diversity among the isolates with dominant ST 320 (21.2%) and ST 13223 (19.3%), which were mainly found in Vietnam. Non-typeables accounted for most of the new STs found in the study. Vaccine-type pneumococcus and macrolide resistance were commonly detected among hospitalized pediatric ARI cases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据