4.7 Article

Operating strategy optimization considering battery aging for a sector coupling system providing frequency containment reserve

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE
卷 68, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2023.107787

关键词

Lithium-ion battery; Battery aging model; State of charge; Net present value; Frequency containment reserve; Power-to-heat module

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Battery storage systems are increasingly used in the frequency containment reserve (FCR) application. Coupling the battery with a power-to-heat module can further increase the system's profitability.
Battery storage systems are increasingly used in the frequency containment reserve (FCR) application. Coupling the battery with a power-to-heat module can further increase the system's profitability. Different studies optimized the hybrid system's operation by considering country-specific regulations. However, lithium-ion battery aging has not yet been included. This work analyses the impact of system dimension and operation on net present value, considering battery aging. The operation strategy consists of adjusting the target SoE and using the deadband degree of freedom, which allows to suspend provision of FCR for minor frequency deviations. Battery lifetime is simulated using a semi-empirical aging model describing graphite anode aging mechanisms. The highest NPV is obtained with a battery dimension of 0.5 Wh/W, 90% target SoE, and normal deadband utilization. For the considered NMC battery cells, deadband utilization contributes to battery lifetime extension when operating at high SoE. Without this cell chemistry-specific lifetime gain, a lower target SoE of 60% and a larger system size of 0.6 is economically more advantageous. In a sensitivity analysis, battery aging was detected as the most crucial parameter influencing system profitability at high FCR prices. The results highlight the importance of including reliable battery aging simulations in future FCR operation optimizations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据