4.7 Article

Exploring the potential of binder-free synthesized cobalt-based phosphate hydrate and pyrophosphate electrodes for supercapacitors

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE
卷 71, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2023.108155

关键词

Cobalt pyrophosphate; Cobalt phosphate hydrate; Supercapacitors; Charge storage kinetics; Hydrothermal

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We synthesized electrodes of cobalt phosphate hydrate (CPH) and cobalt pyrophosphate (CPP) on 3D Ni-foam using a hydrothermal approach. The electrochemical performance of CPH and CPP electrodes was studied by varying the hydrothermal reaction time. Structural, morphological, and electrochemical characterizations were conducted on all the electrodes. The CPH2 electrode showed a specific capacity of 244.4 mAh/g (1,173.33 F/g) at a current density of 30 mA/cm2.
We used a hydrothermal approach to synthesize electrodes of cobalt phosphate hydrate (CPH) and cobalt pyrophosphate (CPP) on 3D Ni-foam. At a steady reaction temperature, the effect of hydrothermal reaction time (0.5 to 2.5 h) on the electrochemical performance of CPH and CPP electrodes is studied. The structural, morphological, and electrochemical characterizations of all the CPH and CPP electrodes were thoroughly investigated. X-ray diffraction (XRD), FTIR, and Raman study confirm the crystalline and amorphous nature of the synthesized CPH and CPP materials, respectively. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) investigation reveals nanoflakes structures of all the electrodes. Electrochemical measurements of CPH and CPP electrodes were conducted in a 1 M KOH electrolyte over -0.2 to 0.55 V versus SCE (for CPH) and -0.2 to 0.3 V versus SCE for CPP. The CPH2 electrode, demonstrated a specific capacity of 244.4 mAh/g (1,173.33 F/g) at a current density of 30 mA/cm2. The charge storage dynamics of the CPH2 electrode is discussed using the power law. Furthermore, a hybrid supercapacitor is assembled with CPH/CPP and activated carbon (AC) for electrochemical measurements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据