4.7 Article

Co-TCPP/MXene film electrodes and patterned interdigital electrodes with high performance for flexible all-solid supercapacitors

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE
卷 70, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2023.107973

关键词

Co-TCPP; Flexible; Patterned electrode; Supercapacitor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the development of electronic technology, there is an increasing demand for flexible power supplies in portable and wearable electronics. Researchers have developed MXene and Co-TCPP nanosheet composites (CoMX) with excellent electrochemical properties through electrostatic self-assembly. The CoMX film electrodes exhibit high specific capacitance and excellent cycling stability, making them promising for flexible energy storage devices.
With the development of electronic technology, portable and wearable electronics are becoming increasingly indispensable in our lives, which promotes a high demand for flexible power supplies. To develop lightweight, flexible, and high performance energy storage devices, we have prepared MXene and Co-TCPP nanosheet composites (CoMX) with excellent electrochemical properties by electrostatic self-assembly. Co-TCPP is inserted between MXene layers and successfully improves ion accessibility and enhances electrochemical performance. CoMX film electrodes fabricated by vacuum filtration show high specific capacitance (1591.7 mF/cm2) and exhibit excellent cycling stability, with a capacity retention rate of 99.81 % after 8000 cycles. Flexible all-solidstate supercapacitors (SC) assembled with CoMX film and interdigital electrodes both exhibit excellent capacitance performance. The in-plane SC exhibits competitive specific capacitance (330.0 mF/cm2) and energy density (37.13 & mu;Wh/cm2 at 450 & mu;W/cm2). The specific capacitance and energy density of interdigital SC achieve 89.9 mF/cm2 and 12.9 & mu;Wh/cm2, respectively. The competitive performance of both devices makes them highly promising for flexible energy storage devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据