Cost-optimal Power-to-Methanol: Flexible operation or intermediate storage?

The synthesis of methanol from captured carbon dioxide and green hydrogen could be a promising replacement for the current fossil-based production. The major energy input and cost driver for such a process is the electricity for hydrogen production. Time-variable electricity cost or availability thus motivates flexible operation. However, it is unclear if each unit of the process should be operated flexibly, and if storage of electricity or hydrogen reduces the methanol production cost. To answer these questions, we modeled a Power-to-Methanol plant with batteries and hydrogen storage. Using this model, we solved a combined design and scheduling optimization problem, which provides the optimal size of the units of the plant and their optimal (quasi-stationary) operation. The annualized cost of methanol was minimized for a grid-connected and a stand-alone case study considering current and future (2030) unit cost scenarios. The optimization results confirm that storage, especially hydrogen storage, is particularly beneficial when the electricity price is high and highly fluctuating. In future unit cost scenarios, batteries could play an even bigger role due to the expected significant cost reduction. Irrespective of the presence of storage, the whole Power-to-Methanol plant should be operated flexibly: even moderate flexibility of the methanol synthesis unit significantly reduces the production cost.

Automated summary

The synthesis of methanol from captured carbon dioxide and green hydrogen could be a promising replacement for the current fossil-based production. The study found that storage, especially hydrogen storage, is particularly beneficial when the electricity price is high and highly fluctuating, and in the future, batteries could play a bigger role.