4.8 Article

Hydrologic control of carbon cycling and aged carbon discharge in the Congo River basin

期刊

NATURE GEOSCIENCE
卷 9, 期 9, 页码 687-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NGEO2778

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SCHN 621/3-3, RU 458/29-3, GR 1845/2-3, SCHE 903/1]
  2. US National Science Foundation [OCE-0137005]
  3. European Research Council (ERC) [258734]
  4. DFG Research Center/Cluster of Excellence 'The Ocean in the Earth System' at MARUM-Center for Marine Environmental Sciences, University of Bremen
  5. [ICM-NC120066]
  6. [FONDECYT1140536]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The age of organic material discharged by rivers provides information about its sources and carbon cycling processes within watersheds. Although elevated ages in fluvially transported organic matter are usually explained by erosion of soils and sedimentary deposits(1,2), it is commonly assumed that mainly young organic material is discharged from flat tropical watersheds due to their extensive plant cover and rapid carbon turnover(3-7.) Here we present compound-specific radiocarbon data of terrigenous organic fractions from a sedimentary archive offshore the Congo River, in conjunction with molecular markers for methane-producing land cover reflecting wetland extent. We find that the Congo River has been discharging aged organic matter for several thousand years, with apparently increasing ages from the mid-to the Late Holocene. This suggests that aged organic matter in modern samples is concealed by radiocarbon from atmospheric nuclear weapons testing. By comparison to indicators for past rainfall changes we detect a systematic control of organic matter sequestration and release by continental hydrology, mediating temporary carbon storage in wetlands. As aridification also leads to exposure and rapid remineralization of large amounts of previously stored labile organic matter, we infer that this process may cause a profound direct climate feedback that is at present underestimated in carbon cycle assessments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据