4.8 Article

Tropospheric ozone change from 1980 to 2010 dominated by equatorward redistribution of emissions

期刊

NATURE GEOSCIENCE
卷 9, 期 12, 页码 875-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NGEO2827

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [1 R21 ES022600-01]
  2. Environmental Protection Agency STAR [834285, RD83587801]
  3. NOAA's Health of the Atmosphere and Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Programs
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26220101] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ozone is an important air pollutant at the surface(1), and the third most important anthropogenic greenhouse gas in the troposphere(2). Since 1980, anthropogenic emissions of ozone precursors-methane, non-methane volatile organic compounds, carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxides (NOx)have shifted from developed to developing regions. Emissions have thereby been redistributed equatorwards(3-6), where they are expected to have a stronger effect on the tropospheric ozone burden due to greater convection, reaction rates and NOx sensitivity(7-11). Here we use a global chemical transport model to simulate changes in tropospheric ozone concentrations from 1980 to 2010, and to separate the influences of changes in the spatial distribution of global anthropogenic emissions of short-lived pollutants, the magnitude of these emissions, and the global atmospheric methane concentration. We estimate that the increase in ozone burden due to the spatial distribution change slightly exceeds the combined influences of the increased emission magnitude and global methane. Emission increases in Southeast, East and South Asia may be most important for the ozone change, supported by an analysis of statistically significant increases in observed ozone above these regions. The spatial distribution of emissions dominates global tropospheric ozone, suggesting that the future ozone burden will be determined mainly by emissions from low latitudes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据