4.8 Article

Contribution of copy number variants to schizophrenia from a genome-wide study of 41,321 subjects

期刊

NATURE GENETICS
卷 49, 期 1, 页码 27-35

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/ng.3725

关键词

-

资金

  1. US National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) [U01 MH094421]
  2. MRC [UKDRI-3003, MR/L023784/2, G0600972, MR/K013807/1, G0901310, G0700995, G1100583, MR/P005748/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [U01MH094421, U01MH094411, U01MH109536, U01MH109528, U01MH109539, U01MH109514, U01MH109501, R01MH095034] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. Lundbeck Foundation [R155-2014-1724] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Medical Research Council [MR/K013807/1, MR/P005748/1, G0600972, G0700995, MR/L010305/1, G0901310, UKDRI-3003, MR/L023784/2, G1100583] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0512-10110, PDA/02/06/016, RP-PG-0606-1049] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Copy number variants (CNVs) have been strongly implicated in the genetic etiology of schizophrenia (SCZ). However, genome-wide investigation of the contribution of CNV to risk has been hampered by limited sample sizes. We sought to address this obstacle by applying a centralized analysis pipeline to a SCZ cohort of 21,094 cases and 20,227 controls. A global enrichment of CNV burden was observed in cases (odds ratio (OR) = 1.11, P = 5.7 x 10(-15)), which persisted after excluding loci implicated in previous studies (OR = 1.07, P = 1.7 x 10(-6)). CNV burden was enriched for genes associated with synaptic function (OR = 1.68, P = 2.8 x 10(-11)) and neurobehavioral phenotypes in mouse (OR = 1.18, P = 7.3 x 10(-5)). Genome-wide significant evidence was obtained for eight loci, including 1q21.1, 2p16.3 (NRXN1), 3q29, 7q11.2, 15q13.3, distal 16p11.2, proximal 16p11.2 and 22q11.2. Suggestive support was found for eight additional candidate susceptibility and protective loci, which consisted predominantly of CNVs mediated by nonallelic homologous recombination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据