4.6 Article

Novel and Simple Method for Quantification of 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol with Microbial Conversion to 2,4,6-Trichloroanisole

期刊

MICROORGANISMS
卷 11, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11092133

关键词

2,4,6-trichloroanisole (TCA); 2,4,6-trichlorophenol (TCP); odor threshold; O-methylation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a method combining microbial conversion and instrumental analysis was proposed to quantify 2,4,6-trichlorophenol (TCP) to 2,4,6-trichloroanisole (TCA). A strain named Mycolicibacterium sp. CB14 was obtained, which exhibited high and stable conversion rate of TCP to TCA. This method can be used to manage the taste and odor problems caused by TCA in drinking water.
Contamination with 2,4,6-trichloroanisole (TCA) often causes taste and odor (T&O) problems in drinking water due to its low odor threshold concentration. Microbial O-methylation of the precursor 2,4,6-trichlorophenol (TCP) would be the dominant mechanism for TCA formation. Simple and rapid measurement of TCP in the low concentration range is necessary to control the problems induced by TCA. In this study, the combination of microbial conversion and instrumental analysis was proposed as a method of TCP quantification. Fungi and bacteria were isolated from various water samples and examined for their ability to produce TCA from TCP. As a result, a strain exhibiting quantitative TCA production and a high growth rate was obtained and named Mycolicibacterium sp. CB14. The conversion rate of TCP to TCA by this strain was found to be high and stable (85.9 +/- 5.3%), regardless of the applied TCP concentration, although within the range of 0.1-10 mu g/L. The limits of detection and quantification for TCP by this proposed method were determined to be 5.2 ng/L and 17.3 ng/L, respectively. By improving the methods, Mycolicibacterium sp. CB14 could be used for the quantification of TCP at very low concentration levels, which is sufficient to manage the T&O problem caused by TCA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据